TIA: documentation that holds up
A TIA is a warning shot. The deficit is gone, the patient looks well — and the stroke risk is highest in the next 48 hours. The ED is often the only contact during that window, so the chart has to show a careful history, a complete exam, the workup arranged, and a disposition that gets the patient covered before the stroke arrives.
01What's at stake
Stroke risk after TIA is roughly 5%–10% at 2 days and 11%–17% at 90 days, and about half of the strokes within a week happen in the first 24 hours. ED misdiagnosis is reported as high as 60%, and "symptoms resolved" is falsely reassuring — in one same-day clinic series, 26% of patients with reportedly resolved symptoms still had a deficit on careful exam. The defensible chart is built on the documented history and exam, not on the fact that the patient feels normal now.
02Can't-miss & mimics
- Evolving stroke — the deficit may recur or complete; TIA, transient symptoms with infarction, and stroke are a continuum.
- Hypoglycemia — check a glucose on everyone; the cheapest reversible mimic.
- Arterial dissection — especially in younger patients; neck pain, Horner syndrome.
- Seizure (Todd paralysis), complicated migraine, mass lesion — common mimics (seizure ~44%, migraine ~24% in one cohort).
- Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation — a single normal ECG does not exclude it.
03History & exam
- Abrupt, "negative" focal symptoms (loss of strength/speech/vision) fit ischemia; diffuse "positive" symptoms (confusion, LOC, lightheadedness) usually don't. → true TIA vs mimic
- Stuttering / recurrent episodes signal an unstable plaque — high risk even if currently asymptomatic. → aggressive workup
- Amaurosis fugax, transient limb-shaking? → carotid territory / tight stenosis
- Complete, stepwise neuro exam — cranial nerves, visual fields, strength, sensation, language, coordination. NIHSS = 0 does not exclude a deficit, and posterior-circulation findings (truncal ataxia, visual changes, Horner) are poorly captured by NIHSS.
Skip the typing
Work the case in the Stroke / focal deficit Workup — it records last-known-well, glucose, the neuro exam, and pathway decisions, and assembles an MDM that documents the deficit, the workup, and disposition reasoning for the high-risk window.
04Workup & disposition
- Glucose on everyone; basic labs and coagulation studies per AHA/ASA.
- Neuroimaging within 24h — DWI-MRI is preferred; non-contrast CT is falsely negative in at least a third of TIAs. Adding CT angiography raises the negative predictive value toward MRI levels.
- Vascular imaging (carotid/intracranial) and ECG in all; consider prolonged rhythm monitoring for occult AFib (a single ECG finds it in only ~2%).
- Secondary prevention — antiplatelet therapy (or anticoagulation for cardioembolic source), statin, BP control; symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥70% benefits from endarterectomy within 2 weeks.
- Disposition — admit / observation unit / rapid-access TIA clinic. AHA/ASA: consider hospitalization for ABCD2 >2, evidence of focal ischemia, or when 2-day follow-up isn't realistically achievable. Front-load the workup; don't send the patient into the high-risk window with only a routine referral.
05Risk tools & evidence
- ABCD2 — Age >60, BP >140/90, Clinical features (unilateral weakness 2 / speech without weakness 1), Duration (≥60 min 2 / 10–59 min 1), Diabetes. A general gauge of short-term risk only — it is miscalculated in ~a third of ED cases and should not be the sole basis for disposition. Johnston SC, et al. Lancet. 2007; Perry JJ, et al. CMAJ. 2011.
- Urgent treatment works — front-loaded evaluation and secondary prevention reduced early recurrent stroke by ~80%. Rothwell PM, et al. (EXPRESS) Lancet. 2007.
06What to document
07Where charts fail
- Treating "symptoms resolved" as a rule-out — a quarter still harbor a deficit on careful exam.
- Charting "neuro normal" without the stepwise exam, or trusting NIHSS = 0.
- Stopping at a normal CT (one-third falsely negative) with only a delayed referral.
- Accepting one normal ECG and not pursuing paroxysmal AFib.
- Letting an ABCD2 score (or a consultant's reliance on it) be the documented reason for discharge.
08Sources
- Siket MS, Edlow JA. Transient ischemic attack: an evidence-based update. Emergency Medicine Practice (EB Medicine). 2013;15(1).
- Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, et al. Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: AHA/ASA scientific statement. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2276-2293.
- Johnston SC, Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh MN, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after TIA. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):283-292.
- Perry JJ, Sharma M, Sivilotti ML, et al. Prospective validation of the ABCD2 score in the ED. CMAJ. 2011;183(10):1137-1145.
- Rothwell PM, Giles MF, Chandratheva A, et al. Effect of urgent treatment of TIA and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS). Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1432-1442.
© 2026 Kim Trinh, MD. All rights reserved. Educational only — synthesized from EB Medicine and primary literature. Synthetic examples. Not medical advice — apply local protocol and judgment.