Complaint · Laceration & wound

Laceration & wound: documentation that holds up

A laceration looks like the most routine thing in the ED — which is exactly why missed tendons, nerves, and retained foreign bodies are among the most-litigated outcomes in wound care. The defensible chart documents the neurovascular and tendon exam before anesthesia, the wound exploration, the foreign-body assessment, and the tetanus decision.

01What's at stake

The failures are predictable: a partial tendon laceration that wasn't tested through range of motion, a digital nerve injury charted as "neurovascularly intact" only after lidocaine, a glass or wood fragment left in the wound, and a knuckle laceration that was really a fight bite closed primarily into a joint. The exam that matters happens before you anesthetize and while you explore.

02Can't-miss issues

  • Tendon injury — test each tendon individually through full range of motion; a partial laceration moves but is weak/painful.
  • Nerve injury — two-point discrimination distal to the wound, tested before local anesthetic.
  • Retained foreign body — glass, wood, metal; high-risk mechanisms and a gritty wound → image.
  • Deep-structure / joint / vascular involvement — open joint, fracture through the wound, arterial injury.
  • Fight bite / infection-prone wound — laceration over the MCP from a tooth; don't close primarily.

03The exam (before anesthesia)

  • Neurovascular first — sensation (two-point discrimination), distal pulses/perfusion, and motor — documented before infiltrating local anesthetic. → before lidocaine
  • Tendon testing — each tendon individually, against resistance, through full range of motion (a retracted end hides out of the wound at rest). → full ROM
  • Explore the wound to its base in a bloodless field — depth, foreign body, joint capsule, bone.
  • Foreign-body imaging — radiographs detect glass and metal; ultrasound for radiolucent wood/organic material when suspicion persists.

Skip the typing

Work the case in the Laceration & Wound Workup — it records the pre-anesthesia distal exam, the wound exploration, foreign-body imaging, and tetanus status, and assembles an MDM that documents the tendon/nerve/foreign-body assessment.

04Irrigation, closure & prophylaxis

  • Irrigation — copious irrigation with normal saline or potable tap water (roughly 50–100 mL per cm of wound) at adequate pressure is the workhorse of infection prevention.
  • Timing of closure — the "golden period" is a guide, not a hard rule; well-vascularized wounds (face/scalp) can be closed later, while older or contaminated wounds may be left for delayed primary closure or healing by secondary intention.
  • Closure method — sutures, staples (scalp/trunk), tissue adhesive (low-tension, dry wounds), or wound tape, matched to location and tension.
  • Tetanus — update per immunization history and wound type (tetanus-prone vs clean/minor); give immunoglobulin for tetanus-prone wounds in the under-/unimmunized.
  • Antibiotics are not routine for simple lacerations; reserve for bites, heavily contaminated wounds, open fractures/joints, and the immunocompromised.

05What to document

▼ weak
"3 cm laceration to hand, cleaned, anesthetized, sutured. Neurovascularly intact. Tetanus UTD. Discharged."
▲ defensible
"3 cm volar laceration; before anesthesia — sensation intact to two-point discrimination distal to the wound, distal perfusion normal, motor intact. Flexor tendons tested individually through full range of motion — intact. Explored to base in a bloodless field — no tendon/joint involvement, no foreign body (radiograph negative for radiopaque FB). Mechanism not a clenched-fist injury (no fight bite). Irrigated with saline, closed with 4-0 nylon. Tetanus updated. Antibiotics not indicated for this clean wound. Wound-check and return precautions for redness, drainage, fever, or loss of sensation/motion; suture removal interval given."

06Where charts fail

  • Charting "neurovascularly intact" only after local anesthetic — the sensory exam is no longer reliable.
  • Not testing tendons through full range of motion — missing a partial or retracted laceration.
  • Closing a wound without exploring to the base — missing a retained foreign body or open joint.
  • Closing a knuckle laceration without recognizing the fight bite.
  • No documented irrigation, tetanus decision, or wound-care/return precautions.

07Sources

  • Duvidovich M, Sanders JE. Pediatric wound care and laceration repair in the emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice (EB Medicine). 2025.
  • Forsch RT, Little SH, Williams C. Laceration repair: a practical approach. Am Fam Physician. 2017;95(10):628-636.
  • Quinn JV, Polevoi SK, Kohn MA. Traumatic lacerations: what are the risks for infection and has the 'golden period' of laceration care disappeared? Emerg Med J. 2014;31(2):96-100.
  • American College of Surgeons / CDC. Tetanus prophylaxis in wound management. MMWR / ACS guidance.

© 2026 Kim Trinh, MD. All rights reserved. Educational only — synthesized from EB Medicine and primary literature. Synthetic examples. Not medical advice — apply local protocol and judgment.