Chest pain: documentation that holds up
Your scribe captures the story. This is the reasoning it can't hear — the questions to ask, the can't-miss diagnoses to exclude on paper, and the validated tools that make the exclusion defensible.
▸Critical pathway
Original, evidence-based synthesis — the critical diagnoses you cannot miss, the tests that catch them, and the interventions that can’t wait. Apply local protocol and judgment.
- 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes of arrival; continuous cardiac monitor, IV access, and full vitals including bilateral blood pressure and SpO₂.
- If unstable (hypotension, hypoxia, or severe distress): resuscitate while considering STEMI, massive pulmonary embolism, tension pneumothorax, and aortic dissection in parallel.
- 12-lead ECG, repeated if pain is ongoing or evolving
- Serial high-sensitivity troponin
- Chest X-ray
- Targeted CT angiography (dissection or PE) and bedside echo / lung ultrasound
STEMI / acute coronary syndrome
- Trigger
- Ischemic ECG changes, or ongoing pain with a suggestive risk story
- Test
- ECG plus serial troponin; HEART score to risk-stratify
- Intervention
- Aspirin; activate the cath lab for STEMI; cardiology and anticoagulation for high-risk NSTE-ACS
Aortic dissection
- Trigger
- Tearing or migratory pain, a pulse or blood-pressure differential, or a widened mediastinum
- Test
- CT angiography of the aorta
- Intervention
- Impulse control — IV beta-blocker (esmolol or labetalol) to a heart rate below 60, then a vasodilator to SBP 100–120; emergent surgery for type A
Pulmonary embolism
- Trigger
- Pleuritic pain, dyspnea, or VTE risk factors
- Test
- Pretest probability (Wells / PERC), then d-dimer or CT pulmonary angiography
- Intervention
- Anticoagulation; consider thrombolysis for massive PE with shock
Tension / spontaneous pneumothorax
- Trigger
- Decreased breath sounds; hypotension with tracheal deviation signals tension
- Test
- Chest X-ray or lung ultrasound — do not delay decompression for tension
- Intervention
- Immediate needle or finger thoracostomy, then chest tube
Esophageal rupture (Boerhaave)
- Trigger
- Forceful vomiting followed by chest pain with subcutaneous emphysema
- Test
- CT chest with contrast or esophagram
- Intervention
- NPO, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and urgent surgical / GI consultation
Risk-stratify with HEART (plus Wells/PERC when PE is in play): a low score with negative serial troponin supports shared-decision discharge; intermediate warrants observation with serial troponin; high risk is admitted with cardiology involvement.
01What's at stake
Missed acute coronary syndrome and missed aortic catastrophe are among the highest-liability misses in emergency medicine. The chart has to show you actively considered them and why you judged them unlikely — not just the diagnosis you landed on.
02Can't-miss differential
- Acute coronary syndrome — ECG + serial troponin + a risk story.
- Pulmonary embolism — pretest probability drives imaging.
- Aortic dissection — tearing, maximal-at-onset, migratory pain; pulse/BP differential.
- Tension/spontaneous pneumothorax and esophageal perforation — examination and imaging.
03History — the questions that change your decision
Protective (ask & chart the negatives):
- Tearing, maximal-at-onset, migratory pain? → dissection
- Associated syncope? → dissection / PE / arrhythmia
Risk-tool inputs (these are the scores):
- Exertional, pressure, radiation, diaphoresis? → HEART history
- Cardiac risk factors? → HEART risk factors
- Hemoptysis · recent surgery/immobilization · prior VTE · unilateral leg swelling · estrogen use? → Wells & PERC
Skip the typing
Answer these in the Workup and it fills the HEART, Wells, and PERC tools and assembles a copy-paste decision-making block — your differential and the reasoning for why the can't-miss diagnoses are less likely.
04Risk tools & evidence
- HEART — risk-stratifies ACS for disposition; low scores (0–3) identify a low-risk group. Six AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC. Neth Heart J. 2008.
- Wells (PE) — pretest probability that, with d-dimer, guides imaging. Wells PS, et al. Thromb Haemost. 2000.
- PERC — in a low-probability patient, zero criteria makes PE testing unnecessary. Kline JA, et al. J Thromb Haemost. 2004.
05What to document
06Where charts fail
- Documenting the result ("troponin normal") without the reasoning it supports.
- No pertinent negatives for dissection — the cheapest, most defensible line to add.
- Citing no tool when one fits, leaving risk stratification implicit.
07Sources
- Six AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC. Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score. Neth Heart J. 2008.
- Wells PS, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model for pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2000.
- Kline JA, et al. Criteria to safely rule out PE without testing (PERC). J Thromb Haemost. 2004.
© 2026 Kim Trinh, MD. All rights reserved. Educational only. Synthetic examples. Not medical advice — apply local protocol and judgment.